Category: Sex Tips

  • Five Great Ways to Use Personal Erotic Hypnosis

    Five Great Ways to Use Personal Erotic Hypnosis

    Erotic hypnosis workshops taught by Dr. Amy Marsh
    Erotic hypnosis workshops taught by Dr. Amy Marsh.

    I predict that erotic hypnosis will be the hot new erotic trend of 2014. There are so many great things you can do with it, for yourself and with your lovers. 

    Consenting adults use personal erotic hypnosis to enhance and enrich their sexual relationships. Erotic hypnosis is so versatile you can adapt it to any scenario: romantic;  tantric; edgy; and even kinky. Erotic hypnosis can help you increase (or decrease) all kinds of sensations, boost your fantasy life, and add multiple dimensions to any sexy role play. Use erotic hypnosis as foreplay or to intensify the hottest parts of your sexual encounters. Use it alone (erotic self-hypnosis), with a partner, or in a group. Like a trusty vibrator, erotic hypnosis can go just about anywhere… 

    Here are just five of the many great ways you can use erotic hypnosis:

    1. Getting in the Mood. If you’re too stressed to even think about sex, ask your partner to indulge you with a long, soothing progressive relaxation induction that gradually shifts into sensual, arousing imagery. This is as simple as reading a script, though you can certainly ad lib as you learn more about basic hypnotic techniques.

    2. Getting in the Groove. In order to become aroused and sustain that loving feeling, you need to stay on the right side of your parasympathetic nervous system (until you’re close to orgasm, which is when your sympathetic nervous system kicks into high gear). You can use hypnotic relaxation techniques to increase your sexual self-confidence and banish performance anxiety.

    3. Getting in Touch. When you’re “entranced,” it’s easy to experience an increase in sensual awareness and sensation by simply listening to your lover’s suggestions and succumbing to the power of your imagination. Trust me, your body will respond. Hypnosis plus touch is also a potent combination.

    4. Getting Hot! Deepen your sexual experiences on all levels – sensations, fantasies, variety, role play, and even hypnotic orgasms. Basic hypnotic skills can take you there.

    5. Getting Kinky. You can create wild and elaborate fantasy scenarios without spending a dime on equipment and toys. Use hypnosis to imagine and rehearse something you might want to try in the future, or to provide an extra dimension for your present fun and games.

    Erotic hypnosis also has a lot to offer people who have chronic illnesses and/or physical impairments that might make some sexual activities difficult. With erotic hypnosis, you can take your mind – and your sexual responses – where you body might not physically follow.

    Of course, erotic hypnosis should only be used in a responsible way, with a lot of trust and a lot of talking beforehand – working out most of what you want to try and experience, in advance, and getting clear consent for every part of it. There’s much more to be said on this topic – and about the basic hypnosis skills you must acquire – but for now, this is a glimpse into the benefits and uses of recreational, erotic hypnosis.

    Gustav Klimt Judith I, 1901 Öl auf Leinwand 84 x 42 cm

  • In which I put my finger on it… and keep it there!

    In which I put my finger on it… and keep it there!

     

    Total Responses.

    (Please note: as this blog is concerned with biological qualities of genitalia mostly known as “female,” I will be using the basic binary categories of “male/female” with regard to sex – not gender – and terms “woman/man” in the average cisgendered manner, when it seems simpler to do so. Even so, the gender neutral pronouns “ze” and “hir” are incorporated into this article as well. I realize too little is known about the sexual responses of people with a wider variety of sex characteristics, which – for all we know – could possibly include variations in the muscle responses currently assigned to male and female categories, below. We need more research!)

    Many (if not most) people with female genitals have known the disheartening frustration of being with a lover who somehow falls out of sync close to the moments of orgasm. The lover may change hir stroke, pressure, rhythm, or in some cases may even remove the intimate touch that is working so well, thinking that the inevitable is about to happen – and surely will happen – needing no more help from hir. And of course what happens when the touch changes is usually nothing. The approach to orgasm is typically interrupted for the person with biological female genitals and ze then drops back into what Masters and Johnson first dubbed the “plateau stage” of the sexual response cycle. The considerate lover or the proactive female hirself must then take matters in hand and begin to build excitement all over again – or else ze suffers various forms of resentment, resignation, or simple erotic frustration.
    “Women take a long time to cum.” It’s a concept deeply embedded in our Western notions of sexuality. But why is it that “look, Ma, no hands!” works for those with a biological penis at the “point of no return” but not for those possessing a gloriously complex clitoral structure? Is it really something about Mary?
    Well, yes, actually. And yes, something else too… But before we get into that, let’s turn our gaze to one of the most brilliant and least regarded sex research pioneers of the last century, Mary Jane Sherfey (1918-1983). Sherfey died just as American women finally blasted into outer space, but what I really deplore is that she missed the age of blogging. If there’s any sexologist’s ghost that I’d be willing to channel on a dark and stormy night, it would be Sherfey. Of course I’m not alone in my admiration. Sherfey has influenced early pioneers of the feminist women’s health movement, such as Suzann Gage and the other women who co-authored A New View of a Woman’s Body (1991, Federation of Feminist Women’s Health Centers). Authors such as Rebecca Chalker, of The Clitoral Truth, are solid Sherfey fans. Others may give Sherfey a nod (and a wink?) but seldom address her depth. The authors of Sex at Dawn cite her, but inadequately, considering that Sex at Dawn is exactly what Sherfey was getting at! As for me, I first learned of Sherfey from Ed Brecher’s book, The Sex Researchers, as she was lumped into one little chapter with the rest of the women (I hate it when they do that…). Even based on Brecher’s brief account, I could not rest until I tracked down her work: The Nature and Evolution of Female Sexuality. The rest, as we say, is mystery…
    Fast forward to the present, where we inhabit a swirling internet world of “sexperts,” sexologists, sex therapists, romance advice divas, blissful tantrikas, and snarky bloggers – all jockeying for position like diphallic terata in a too small pair of shorts. And yet the reams of advice written to the luckless female who didn’t quite cum, and to those who profess to love her (hir), must by now wrap around the earth three times or stretch to the moon and back. “Give plenty of clitoral stimulation”, “don’t miss the g-spot,” and when all else fails (or before it does), just make your vibrator your own best friend. These are all good things to consider and do, but does anyone ever ask “why?”
    You know what? Sexologists forgot there was a “why.” And so we forgot to tell people about it. And probably the reason we forgot about it is that Sherfey was one of the very few who scooped up an important fact and put it into context and so most of us never even knew it to begin with.
    I felt compelled to research this question: what do people believe about the female bodied orgasm? It’s been an interesting inquiry. My recent, brief survey has yielded some fascinating results. I’ve finished data collection and begun to look at results. Even now the data appear to support my initial suspicion about a pervasive belief: namely, that many people believe that women have an orgasmic “point of no return” – as male bodies do – even if stimulation stops or changes, at least some of the time.
    But according to Mary Jane Sherfey (The Nature & Evolution of Female Sexuality, pg. 108), this is physiologically impossible: “It must be recalled that all women must be stimulated continuously, especially during the plateau and orgasmic phases, or the level of sexual tension will drop almost instantaneously. It must be recalled that contrary to the male’s, the female’s muscles of orgasmic response will not continue to contract involuntarily; hence an orgasm may be interrupted at any point.”
    In a side note at the bottom of the page, Sherfey also says: “The difference has not been explained. It would be interesting to determine if the same difference exists in animals, and if there is an actual difference in the neural end organs of the muscles or in the muscle fibers themselves.”
    I attempted to find out more about these muscle fibers, but I suspect it will take an exhaustive search to uncover actual research, if any does exist. Meanwhile, we’ve got an interesting situation. Most of the people (n=164) who took my survey were highly educated and a great many of them have had formal training in human sexuality and are even practitioners in the field. Even so, an astounding 64% answered “sometimes true” to a question which read: “females have a “point of no return” when an orgasm is inevitable, even if stimulation stops.” (I will provide more results in a follow up blog.)
    What in the world is going on? Here we’ve got reams of sex advice on the one hand, and our own lived experiences on the other, and yet somehow we believe that a person with female genitals – and the muscle responses to match – is capable – at least sometimes – of completing orgasmic response without continued stimulation. Could it be that we are still so heavily influenced by the male concept of hands-free, “it’s a cummin’ and thar ain’t nuthin I kin do about it!”, orgasmic response that we continue to apply those expectations to bodies which do not have pelvic muscles which work in that manner?
    I do want to say that I am not male bashing here – I think it makes perfect sense to figure that if your body has muscles that work a certain way, that other people, even those with different genitalia, probably function similarly. After all, we’ve all been hearing for years that “female sexuality” is “just as good as” or “just as powerful as” “male sexuality” and that the complex structure of the clitoris was extensive and gosh darn it, worthy of as much respect and regard as a penis.
    So – to restate my point – I think it’s reasonable that biological males, whose muscles contract involuntarily as orgasm appears inevitable, may feel – due to their familiarity with their own physical responses – that female bodies naturally do the same thing, somehow, somewhere, in the mysterious depths of impending orgasm. And because the average biological male in good sexual health usually finds that he can play around with changing sensations at the brink of orgasm – or even stop – he may also tend to switch gears, or back off slightly, or change something when he perceives that a biological female is about to tip over into orgasm. And then, whattaya know, all of a sudden it’s back to square two, if not one.
    My survey results confirm the existence of this belief in the hands-off, female “point of no return” among cisgendered males and females. That women believe this is very interesting. There may have been one or two accomplished Tantrikas and sexual Taoists in my sample – women who cultivate interesting practices – but I haven’t teased them out of the data yet. I do know that we can do all kinds of wonderful things with our orgasmic potential – full body orgasms, multiple orgasms, creating a secret square inch of skin with incredible sensitivity, cumming by just thinking about it, using hypnotic suggestions for pleasure, even engaging in subtle body sex. I know it’s not all biology and body parts.
    However, I think Mary Jane Sherfey’s research, and the results of my survey show us an important piece of neglected sex education – one that could help a lot of lovers, average people who might like to know just a little bit more about how to please themselves and others.
  • “You Can’t Stop a Sneeze…” Or Can You?

    “You Can’t Stop a Sneeze…” Or Can You?

    Buried in the depths of sex research is a small but significant fact – a defining difference between the orgasmic functioning of the usual biological female body and the usual biological male body. For some odd reason, this defining difference was never quite taken up by sex therapists – or never quite adequately explained. Sometimes this difference is almost addressed in sexological literature – but without much understanding of the physiology. Therefore recommendations intended to promote female-bodied orgasms aren’t completely effective. And we’ve been left to fall back on a particularly pervasive assumption…

    I’m being deliberately mysterious as I am running a SurveyMonkey project to test my premise and gather data. The survey is brief and completely confidential. Please add your two cents. I’m testing beliefs and knowledge about female-bodied orgasms.

    Take the survey here. https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/femaleorgasms

    At this point I am looking for more men – cis and trans alike – to respond, as the majority of respondents are female (cis mostly). It would be lovely to have more responses from trans women too, as well as from intersex and other folk. I’ll be posting the research results when I complete the project mid-February.

  • Sex & Sensory Dysfunction

    Sex & Sensory Dysfunction

    Note: An earlier version of this blog was published on Carnal Nation.

    I had a very angry couple in my office. She wanted to receive oral sex, and he couldn’t bear the feeling of anything with a slippery wetness, especially on or near his face. She was also tired of his insistence on a certain sexual routine. She said she’d no longer play his way if he couldn’t reciprocate by giving her what she wanted. For her, it was a straight forward quid pro quo. She’d been accommodating him, now it was his turn. This was not unreasonable. But he considered her request impossible. It wasn’t that he didn’t care, it was that he simply couldn’t do what she asked. Sensations of slippery wetness caused his nervous system to go straight into a “fight, flight or freeze” response. I asked him if he could tolerate the feeling of saran wrap against his mouth and face (which, unfortunately, is somewhat slippery), and I asked her if she’d accept oral sex if he used it. Neither one was crazy about the idea, but they said they’d try. Unfortunately, I never saw this couple again. I have no idea if this suggestion worked.

    I know another woman. She cuts tags from the backs of her clothing, tugs at her uncomfortable brassiere and can’t stand tight waistbands or the stiffness of jeans.  Repetitive noises shatter her concentration and make her feel panicked. She’s kept awake by low volume humming from electronics and appliances. If someone drools into her mouth while kissing her, she feels repulsed, then violent and angry. Her fondest sexual wish is not more orgasms, but the time and space to fully enjoy the one solitary orgasm that occasionally comes her way during partner sex. She tells me that she’s been known to scream “let me integrate, let me integrate!” in the middle of orgasm, begging for a pause in stimulation so she can let the sensations sweep entirely through her body. But her lover’s fondest sexual wish is to cause her to have another orgasm, right away. If one is good, more is better, right? He struggles to understand how essential it is to cease all stimulation and simply hold her (deep, motionless touch) as she “integrates” the pleasure she’s already felt. This is because he’s been told (as many men have been told) that the way to be a “good lover” is to inflict as many orgasms as possible in the shortest amount of time. No matter how many conversations they’ve had, he still can’t shake the notion that multi-orgasmic lovemaking must certainly represent the apex of her desire (and his success), no matter how often she says otherwise.

    So if you think “not tonight, dear, I have a headache” is a flimsy excuse, what would you think about “not tonight, dear, you’ve put the wrong sheets on the bed again and the refrigerator sounds terrible and you smell like you just got off an airplane and my cocoa has lumps in it and therefore I’m on overwhelm and can’t bear to be touched?”

    Sensory integration dysfunction (SID), also known as sensory processing disorder (SPD), is the “walrus in the room” when it comes to clinical sexology and sex therapy. I say “walrus” because people commonly talk about the “elephant in the room” when they want to refer to a commonly acknowledged but unspoken issue. But no one ever imagines there might be a walrus along with or instead of an elephant – that’s how far off the radar “adult sexual-sensory dysfunction” seems to be. And since I think I’ve just coined this term  we can call it “ASSD” for short.

    Here is a very simplified overview of sensory processing dysfunction. As you read, try to think about the implications for sexual intimacy.

    Human sensory systems include: tactile (touch), vestibular (balance), proprioception (body awareness), visual (sight), auditory (hearing), gustatory (taste), and olfactory (smell). Our brain helps us to either discriminate and interpret sensations correctly and/or to protect us from them.

    Integration of sensory experiences is a process which involves registering or being aware of the sensation; orientation or specific focus on the sensation; interpreting the sensation; organizing a response; and then executing a response which has been appropriately regulated or moderated. Understand that we are bombarded by sensory experiences all the time, so that this is not a simple one-at-a-time process. It’s all happening at once, on many levels, many fronts.

    A sensory experience evokes a reaction in a person as he or she becomes aware of it. The reaction usually results in a behavior of some kind, even if it’s just a blink or an increased heart rate. Behaviors are based not just on what a person senses, but how he or she senses it, how the nervous system reacts to it.

    People may have low or high “thresholds” for different sensations and sensory experiences, and it is not usually consistent across the range of senses. You might like really spicy food (high), but prefer very quiet music (low). You can be hypersensitive and overreactive, or hyposensitive and underreactive. If you are hyposensitive in one area, you will look for more of that kind of sensation. You will be a “sensory seeker.” Mosh pits are made for tactile sensory seekers. A hypersensitive person will be sensory avoidant. The person who flinches from an accidental touch is tactile avoidant.

    Another way of putting it is that a person could be under-processing sensation,
over-processing sensation, or processing a sensation with interference (like “white noise”). In terms of treatment plans, it’s important to figure all this out.

    Kids with sensory dysfunction issues are lucky. Or maybe I should say, “luckier” than adults. Because the kid who can’t stop running on tiptoes, or who screams at the touch of play-doh, or who can’t handle bathing, or who bumps into everything, is often noticed, and then usually (best case scenario) gets some help from teachers and/or occupational therapists and other specialists. The parents spend oodles of time supporting their child, read all they can, join organizations, go to conferences, and spend a bundle on special help and the sophisticated equipment, clothing, toys, and learning materials that have been designed for children with SID. The goal, of course, is to improve functioning and chances for a normal life through early intervention.

    Adults with sensory dysfunction issues have to cope with the challenges of everyday life while struggling with their neurological responses to such things as ceiling fans, background noise, off-gassing synthetic carpets, too many people talking at once, uncomfortable work clothes, and so on. They may be socially shunned as “clueless,” “weird,” “geeky,” or “overly sensitive.” They seldom get the kind of support and understanding that many children get, unless they are already getting services and support for some other condition, such as autism or ADHD. Then sensory integration support might be folded into the treatment plan. We can easily imagine the troubles such people might have trying to cope with the demands of a job or profession.

    Now imagine that you’re a person who is “weird,” “geeky” or “overly sensitive,” but you’re lucky enough to have a long-term relationship. Chances are your partner started out as loving and understanding, thinking that once you started to relax and feel secure in the relationship, you’d be less likely to react to the “little things” that seem to drive you nuts. But it’s been years now, and you haven’t changed. All sorts of things set you off. You’re still so nervous! Your partner has a hard time coaxing you into intimacy too, which she thinks would be helpful for both of you – but she doesn’t know that it’s because you can’t get an erection when your teeth hurt, and the reason your teeth are hurting is because that fresh coat of yellow paint on your bedroom walls puts you so much on edge that you’re grinding your teeth just to stay in the room! She’d think you were just making excuses and over-reacting again. She’d think you don’t really love her if something like a color would keep you from feeling aroused. The marriage counselor you both saw said that you had to make an effort to be “less selfish” and your partner agreed. You’ve had too many fights about sex over the years, and you’re very afraid of that kind of fight, so you don’t say anything when your partner begins to stroke you, and nothing much happens, so you just pretend you’re tired, and you shut your eyes against that yellow, which still bruises your nerves even though it’s dark, and so both of you go to sleep unhappy and hurt.

    I think you get the picture.

    Adults can see occupational therapists too – but not usually about their sex lives. I did find one article, dated March, 1980: Treatment Model: Occupational Therapy for Sexual Dysfunction by Evelyn M. Andamo (Sexuality and Disability, Vol. 3, Number 1, March, 1980). The abstract says, “occupational therapists should also look into the patients’ management of sexual activities in the resumption of their sexual roles. It presents the need for the patients’ sexual function to be evaluated and dealt with as a legitimate part of the occupational therapy service. Thus, a conceptual treatment model is described in order that occupational therapy may assist patients in resolving, or adapting to, their sexual dysfunction.”

    My guess, based partially on the age of the article, is that the treatment model might be a little thin on sensory integration issues and is probably more focused on more obvious physical disabilities. In any case, it would be interesting to know how the occupational therapy community responded to this pioneering call for action.

    I began thinking about sensory integration and sexual behavior when I began researching Asperger’s Syndrome and sexuality. I almost cried “bingo!” when I read this statement from one of my respondents: “Sensate focus exercises useless because of sensory integration issues in my aspie ex.” Sensate focus is a sex therapy staple and works pretty well for a lot of people, as these exercises are based on an incremental approach to improving intimate communication and pleasure. But the exercises presume a capacity for normal sensory functioning. I wonder how many sex therapy “failures” are due to unrecognized sensory dysfunction? I feel strongly that we need some really good alternative therapy designs, options and tools to deal with ASSD (remember, for the purposes of this article, that acronym stands for “adult sexual-sensory dysfunction”). At the very least, we need a marriage between clinical sexology/sex therapy and occupational therapy.

    Ideally, sexual-sensory dysfunction should be addressed through a multi-disciplinary focus. Sexologists and sex therapists would be vital, sex-positive members of the team. Autism experts would be helpful because the autism/Asperger’s Syndrome community does recognize something of the quandary that teens and adults are in with regard to sexual intimacy, and the relationship of sensory issues to these difficulties. Occupational therapists (OTs) are crucial – they have the practical insight and expertise based on deep knowledge of how the body works and how it can heal. Well-trained, multi-disciplined surrogates would be helpful too.

    If you’re interested, you can find a sensory processing checklist for adults at:

    http://www.sensory-processing-disorder.com/adult-SPD-checklist.html